Home > Focus Areas > Hidradenitis Suppurativa > Post
  • Saved
Could topical JAK inhibition offer a new option for managing mild-to-moderate hidradenitis suppurativa?

Management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) remains challenging, particularly for patients with mild-to-moderate disease, where therapeutic options are limited and responses to conventional approaches may be inconsistent. Identifying treatments that reduce inflammatory lesion burden while maintaining a favorable safety profile remains an ongoing clinical priority.

A randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase 2 study evaluated a topical Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor cream in adults with Hurley stage I–II HS presenting with 3–10 abscesses and inflammatory nodules (ANs) and no draining tunnels. Patients received twice-daily topical therapy or vehicle for 16 weeks, followed by an extension phase in which all participants used the active treatment as needed through week 32.

At week 16, treatment with the topical JAK inhibitor was associated with a greater reduction in AN count compared with vehicle (least squares mean change −3.61 vs −2.42; P = .0215). Reductions in lesion counts were maintained through week 32 during the extension phase. Patients receiving active treatment also experienced fewer disease flares. The therapy was generally well tolerated, and no grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported during the study period.

These findings suggest a potential role for targeted topical immune modulation in earlier-stage HS, particularly in patients without sinus tracts who may benefit from localized anti-inflammatory approaches. Further studies are needed to better understand long-term efficacy and safety.

How do you currently approach treatment escalation for patients with Hurley stage I–II HS who have persistent inflammatory nodules? What role do you foresee for targeted topical immunomodulators in the early management of HS?

Profile Image
  • 1w
    This is huge because HS is a disease that is so unfavorable to patients and is very challenging to treat overall. A topical biologic which we know works with other dermatitis disorders would greatly impact this et of patients in a good way. Plus being topical versus oral reduces the risk of more systemic side effects. Unfortunately I only I&D and then refer to surgery and/or dermatology
  • 1w
    Topical JAK inhibitors have established well in Psoriasis and Atopic Eczema and very pleasing to see them in the HS arena in early disease and seems like a very good option before the use of the injectable Biologicals will be interesting to see if can be combined with low dose Oral AB to have a much better efficacy
  • 1w
    Topical JAK inhibitors are worth trying, either alone or in combination with other agents such as tretinoin, clindamycin, and resorcinol. Combination therapy often gives the best results as there are synergistic effects with agents that have different mechanisms of action.
  • 2w
    Usually with treatment of Hurley stage I-II HS w/ persistent nodules I would go localized or topical systemic anti-inflammatory agents and if not I can also go to biologics, however it depends on the response of the patient and past treatment failures. I think Jak2 inhibitors will have it's place and we'll start seeing it more in the treatment of HS.
  • 2w
    I like the idea of a safer, efficacious priduct.
  • 2w
    For persistent nodules in Hurley I–II HS, escalation typically moves from topical → oral antibiotics → procedures → biologics (earlier than before).
    • Targeted topical immunomodulators are an emerging adjunct, especially valuable for early, localized disease—but not yet a standalone solution.
  • 2w
    worth a try and would avoid the systemic side effects and risks of oral JAKs
  • 2w
    Previous studies used oral JAK inhibitors such as this trial

    Some of our local dermatologist were not comfortable with oral JAK2 and often involved us. This data on topical JAK2 is very exciting. I would like to see a head to head trial on oral vs topical

Show More Comments